*** WARNING: spoilers, naturally. Don't read if you haven't read "Jingo" or "Snuff" ***
We all know that Nobby Nobbs and Fred Colon are cowardly and not all that bright. However, there are some hidden depths to them that could be explored (perhaps with a stick). I haven't posted this in the character explorations of either character, because it concerns them both.
From the Discworld wiki:
To sum up, Nobby and Colon are more than they appear to be. If Vimes gives them an order or task to perform, I think he can trust them to perform it - though as they see fit, which isn't always as Vimes would want. If he told them to investigate something, he can trust them to do it superficially, maybe, at some point after drinking a few pints here and there and picking up odds-and-ends of information in various pubs. In short, he can trust them with his life - but he'd be daft to trust them with the petty cash box.
What do you think? Is that a fair estimate of their prowess (or lack thereof)?
We all know that Nobby Nobbs and Fred Colon are cowardly and not all that bright. However, there are some hidden depths to them that could be explored (perhaps with a stick). I haven't posted this in the character explorations of either character, because it concerns them both.
From the Discworld wiki:
(From the Nobby article -Ed.)
Together, Nobby and Colon have managed to have many strangely philosophical (or just strange) conversations, including one on whether Death has a first name, or even any friends to call him it. Oddly enough, these conversations hint at Nobby being more intelligent than Colon, with Nobby continually pointing out fatal flaws in Colon's statements and arguments, and Colon mentally scrambling to come up with an answer.
Together, Nobby and Colon have managed to have many strangely philosophical (or just strange) conversations, including one on whether Death has a first name, or even any friends to call him it. Oddly enough, these conversations hint at Nobby being more intelligent than Colon, with Nobby continually pointing out fatal flaws in Colon's statements and arguments, and Colon mentally scrambling to come up with an answer.
(From the Colon article -Ed.)
As Vimes thought it, most of the other watch officers saw a fat, stupid, lazy, cowardly man -- and that was mostly what was there -- but Colon and Nobby have a street-level knowledge of Ankh-Morpork on a par with Vimes, and are good at sensing tension in a crowd. Both are also survivors of the Glorious 25th of May. Colon also performs his duties in Thud! fairly well. He is an amiable jailer, and bright enough to keep the keys in a closed tin box in the bottom drawer of his desk, well out of reach of anything an inmate would be able to use.
His office, in a separate building from the main watch house, is frequented by old acquaintances who want somewhere quiet to get away from the wife, hear what's happening on the street and - in Vimes' words - "gossip like washerwomen." For this free-flowing source of information, Vimes considers the cost of donuts on an expense voucher a very favourable trade.
As Vimes thought it, most of the other watch officers saw a fat, stupid, lazy, cowardly man -- and that was mostly what was there -- but Colon and Nobby have a street-level knowledge of Ankh-Morpork on a par with Vimes, and are good at sensing tension in a crowd. Both are also survivors of the Glorious 25th of May. Colon also performs his duties in Thud! fairly well. He is an amiable jailer, and bright enough to keep the keys in a closed tin box in the bottom drawer of his desk, well out of reach of anything an inmate would be able to use.
His office, in a separate building from the main watch house, is frequented by old acquaintances who want somewhere quiet to get away from the wife, hear what's happening on the street and - in Vimes' words - "gossip like washerwomen." For this free-flowing source of information, Vimes considers the cost of donuts on an expense voucher a very favourable trade.
What do you think? Is that a fair estimate of their prowess (or lack thereof)?