SPOILERS Raising Steam *Warning Spoilers*

Welcome to the Sir Terry Pratchett Forums
Register here for the Sir Terry Pratchett forum and message boards.
Sign up

Tonyblack

Super Moderator
City Watch
Jul 25, 2008
30,966
3,650
Cardiff, Wales
Erm . . . I don't think so. Why would anyone want to read badly written nonsense, full of well loved characters doing unlikely things, when they can just reread the original books?

And yes, I have read some fanfiction and that is why I dislike it so much. :snooty:
 

pip

Sergeant-at-Arms
Sep 3, 2010
8,765
2,850
KILDARE
Got to agree . the actions of the characters in most fan faction reflect something of the fan rather than the characters or original writer. That's not what I want to read.
We'll be inundated with Angua and Sally lesbian pornography before you know it.
 

simmonds91

Lance-Corporal
Oct 29, 2012
248
1,825
I suppose your right, you've read some so you know how rubbish it can get, I have not however and will be reading a lot when no new discworld novels come out. the idea of an angua and sally lesbian fanfic leads to thinking of a vetinari and vimes gay fanfic..... as I recall there is one out there :laugh: twas mentioned on another thread. you've a point about the fans reflection in the work but I can't be satisfied with the same old stories for ever and ever, when T Prtchett passes away there's going to be nothing OTHER than fan fiction (new stuff that is).
 

raisindot

Sergeant-at-Arms
Oct 1, 2009
5,274
2,450
Boston, MA USA
pip said:
Got to agree . the actions of the characters in most fan faction reflect something of the fan rather than the characters or original writer. That's not what I want to read.
We'll be inundated with Angua and Sally lesbian pornography before you know it.
Especially if Kemar does the book cover.. :laugh:
 

The Mad Collector

Sergeant-at-Arms
Sep 1, 2010
9,918
2,850
62
Ironbridge UK
www.bearsonthesquare.com
Tonyblack said:
Erm . . . I don't think so. Why would anyone want to read badly written nonsense, full of well loved characters doing unlikely things, when they can just reread the original books?

And yes, I have read some fanfiction and that is why I dislike it so much. :snooty:
I'm with Tony on this one why would you want to read this dross :rolleyes:
 

meerkat

Sergeant-at-Arms
Jan 16, 2010
9,413
2,800
67
Pocklington East Riding Yorkshire
Tonyblack said:
Erm . . . I don't think so. Why would anyone want to read badly written nonsense, full of well loved characters doing unlikely things, when they can just reread the original books?

And yes, I have read some fanfiction and that is why I dislike it so much. :snooty:
Got to agree with Tony. The originals can not be touched. Fan fiction can be so cheap it is painful. Best to stick with the original.
 
Nov 15, 2011
3,310
2,650
Aust.
Well, I'm about half way through Raising Steam. I'm still enjoying the read but nothing much has happened! My favourite bit so far is the mention, although not by name but I'm guessing it's her, of Nanny Ogg scrounging coffee from the clacks tower at Lancre. Coffee with a drop of Scumble anyone? :laugh:
 

=Tamar

Lieutenant
May 20, 2012
12,918
2,900
Sister Jennifer said:
Well, I'm about half way through Raising Steam. I'm still enjoying the read but nothing much has happened!
It has been said by some that the pace of the book is like a steam engine, slowly accelerating as it builds up steam for the big whoosh at the end, whistles blowing, full speed ahead.
But then, I live where I can still hear railroad whistles and rumbling trains.

I happen to think that even subtle human interactions count as something happening, which is probably why I overreact when I read that complaint. I've read it quite a lot lately about books by Diana Wynne Jones, for instance - books in which there are wars and personal tragedies and families broken up by manipulation behind the scenes. Not enough car chases, I guess.
 
Nov 15, 2011
3,310
2,650
Aust.
=Tamar said:
It has been said by some that the pace of the book is like a steam engine, slowly accelerating as it builds up steam for the big whoosh at the end, whistles blowing, full speed ahead.
Has it been said? I do get it. I will be more patient ;) .

=Tamar said:
I happen to think that even subtle human interactions count as something happening, which is probably why I overreact when I read that complaint. Not enough car chases, I guess.
Are you overreacting? Cool your boots then, I'm not complaining, and don't assume I'm only reading it for the 'car chase'. I don't think anybody reads Terry Pratchett for that reason.
 

=Tamar

Lieutenant
May 20, 2012
12,918
2,900
Sister Jennifer said:
I will be more patient ;) .
Well, there's a bit of action anyway.

Sister Jennifer said:
I'm not complaining, and don't assume I'm only reading it for the 'car chase'. I don't think anybody reads Terry Pratchett for that reason.
Please accept my apology. My overreaction was from my having been reading reviews of other writers online, on blogs and so on, and it seems as though half the reviewers complain about books being "slow" when as near as I can tell (having read the books in question), character and tension are being built by a good author. The other half complain that not enough time is spent tying up every loose end in a story, except when they complain that every loose end is so neatly tied up that the author seems compulsive... probably I should stop reading online reviews.
 

kakaze

Lance-Corporal
Jun 3, 2009
488
1,775
I was pretty disappointed in Raising Steam, not because it was bad per se, but because I always look forward to the next book by Pratchett. Perhaps my standards are too high?

I found the characters way too bombastic. They spent so much time winking mischievously at each other and talking about what scoundrels they were, that they didn't do much that was mischievous or scandalous! Though, to be fair, King does like to talk about himself. Maybe the difference in this book is that he plays such a prominent part that he just kind of started wearing on my nerves.

Another problem I had was with the pace. Others have compared the book to an actual steam engine; starting slow and gathering speed. This is why I drive an internal combustion engine. In a book predominately about a steam engine, you had to read a third of the book before the engine even moved! And it wasn't until you were halfway done before it did anything more than go around in a circle! The three big action scenes were also too brief and lacking in detail to deserve the build-up that they got, especially when Rhys returned to reclaim her throne. The fight on the train wasn't too bad, but it was the same thing over and over; dwarf jumps onto train roof, Moist knocks dwarf off or out, and Vimes gets them all to spill their guts with a friendly little chat.

One of my favourite things about the Discworld books are spotting the cultural references inserted into the stories, followed closely by the clever puns. For example; I found Monstrous Regiment more interesting after reading accounts of women dressing up as men to fight in the American Civil War. Some of the stories I found online appear to have directly inspired several of the characters, though that could easily be a coincidence. In recent books it seems that what we get instead are funny accents that can sometimes be difficult to decipher.

I was also disappointed with Moist. First of all, after resurrecting the Post Office, getting the city started on paper currency (which improves the economy and allows Vetenari to fund his projects), and saving the city from the ancient golums, it seems pretty unfair for Vetenari to once again threaten to execute Moist if he doesn't do something impossible. Add that to the fact that Moist ought to have considerable leverage over Vetenari since he knows the secret of how to control the giant golum army and it seems out of character for him to meekly accept his fate and even volunteer his life on a very risky guarantee. Moist has always liked a little danger in life, but he was always sensible and never suicidal.

Lastly, I've always thought that Pratchett had a habit of recycling favourite jokes in the Disc books, but I'm getting a little tired of seeing Vimes. Don't get me wrong; he's a great character, but he's been in Men at Arms, Feet of Clay, Jingo, The Fifth Elephant, The Truth, The Last Hero, Night Watch, Monstrous Regiment, Going Postal, Thud!, Making Money, Unseen Academicals, Snuff, and Raising Steam. And, of course, "Where's My Cow?". That's more than a third of the Discworld books! Actually, what I'd really like to see, is a book that features Esk (from Equal Rites) as an adult. I'm curious about how she turned out.
 

=Tamar

Lieutenant
May 20, 2012
12,918
2,900
*Spoilers* Re: Raising Steam, The Truth, GP+MM

It just occurred to me that Raising Steam is a successor to The Truth, in that both involve sentient machinery in non-human form. (If you include the golems then RS is also linked to Feet of Clay as well as to Going Postal and Making Money.)
The ancient army golems of MM are shown to be capable of fairly independent action though their programming/chem to obey can't be changed. The humans aren't industrialized enough to catch up with their own plans but the golems temporarily bridge the gap between desire and achievement.

In The Truth, the newspaper press, once built, demands to be fed. In Raising Steam, the engine somehow demands to receive all the latest upgrades, being entirely rebuilt from the almost-toy size of its first appearance into the fastest, strongest, most powerful engine of them all, more mobile than the press and even able to protect itself. The engine demands a track to run on, cargo to carry, people to work on it. It will rule^change the world.
 

User Menu

Newsletter